institutional policies of Pratt institute
The following statements are excerpts from existing Pratt Institute
policies, many of which were written for other audiences. Each policy shows its
origin, and the source for additional information.
Judicial
Process for Students
We at
Pratt Institute have high expectations regarding social and academic conduct,
and we expect everyone to value and uphold the community standards essential to
the pursuit of academic excellence and social responsibility. These standards
are listed in the Bulletin, the Student Handbook, and pamphlets that detail policies
relating to the use of computer technology, sexual assault and harassment, alcohol
and drugs, and human rights, particularly those concerning persons with disabilities.
Academic
Integrity Code and the Pratt Judicial Process
Absolute integrity
is expected of every member of the Pratt community in all academic matters, particularly
with regard to academic honesty. The latter includes plagiarism and cheating.
In addition, the continued registration of any student is contingent upon regular
attendance, the quality of work and proper conduct. Irregular class attendance,
neglect of work, failure to comply with Institute rules and official notices or
conduct not consistent with general good order are regarded as sufficient reasons
for dismissal. The faculty member and/or the Academic Integrity Board adjudicate
cases of academic infractions. The Board does not hear grade disputes because
these receive a final review at the level of the school dean. Students and faculty
are expected to be familiar with and observe academic standards and policies as
well as the procedures to address infractions or resolve disputes. A full description
of these policies and procedures may be found in the Student Handbook and the
Bulletin.
How Are Academic Integrity Cases Handled?
Alleged Academic Integrity Code violations may be adjudicated directly by faculty
members and/or they may be referred to the Academic Integrity Board. The Board
is composed of faculty members, academic administrators, and students. For alleged
Social Conduct Code violations, faculty and academic administrators are urged
to send an incident report to the vice president for Student Affairs who will
follow appropriate procedures.
What Are the Penalties in these
Kinds of Cases?
If the faculty member chooses the first alternative
and determines that the student violated the Academic Integrity Code he or she
may impose the following sanctions:
- Ask the student to repeat the
assignment
- Impose a lower or failing grade for the particular assignment
- Assign
a lower or failing grade for the course.
In addition to a sanction,
the faculty member must report the incident to the registrar. The incident will
be recorded in the student’s non-permanent file. More than one reported
incident to the registrar during a student’s program of study at Pratt will
result in a a hearing before the Academic Integrity Board. If a faculty member
deems a violation to be serious enough, he or she may refer the incident directly
to the Academic integrity Board for adjudication. Whether an allegation is brought
before the Academic Integrity Board for repeated violations or is referred at
once by the faculty member, if the student is found in violation, the Board may
impose the following sanctions:
- Grade sanctions, including the assignment
of a lower or failing grade in the course
- Recommend suspension from the
Institute to the provost
- Recommend dismissal from the Institute to the
provost
How Does the Academic Conduct Appeal Process Work?
Students have the right to appeal the decision of a faculty member
to the Academic Integrity Board and the decision of the Board to the provost.
Specific guidelines ensure that a timely and fair review take place when
a decision of a faculty member or the Academic Integrity Board is appealed. In
the latter case, the provost’s decision is final. The appeal must touch
upon one of the following key issues:
- Did the Academic Integrity Board
conduct itself in such a way that both parties (faculty member and student) had
an adequate opportunity to prepare their case?
- Was the evidence presented
at the hearing “substantial” enough to justify a decision?
- If
the penalty is being appealed, was the sanction imposed in keeping with the gravity
of the violation?
The composition of the Academic Integrity Board
and its procedures, including appeal procedures, are detailed in the document Pratt Community standards: Judicial Procedures. This document is available
in various offices, including the provost, the school deans, the vice president
for Student Affairs, the director of Human Resources and the director of Residential
Life and Housing.
|