| |
| |
|
|
| |
Program Level Student Outcomes
Assessment |  |
|  |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Go to the Toolkit
for Guidelines in Developing Program Mission Statements |
| | Program-level
Student Outcomes Assessment Definition of Student Outcomes
Assessment Assessment is defined as the ongoing process of establishing
clear, measurable expected outcomes of student learning; systematically gathering,
analyze, and interpreting evidence to determine how well student performance
matches expectations; and using the resulting information to understand and improve
student learning in the program. Student outcomes are desired ends or
objectives. They describe what students are expected to be able to demonstrate
after they complete their program. They are distinguished from inputs (such as
attributes of students and faculty) and processes (such as curricular offerings,
and the experience of living in a dormitory). Levels of Student
Outcomes Assessment Assessment of student outcomes can take place
at three levels: Course level: At the
course level, assessment examines the degree to which students achieve the objectives
for a specific course. Faculty members engage in course assessment by evaluating
student performance on assignments, projects, and exams and then fine-tuning their
approach in the course to achieve a better outcome. Program/department
level: At this level, assessment seeks to determine the degree
to which learning goals set by the faculty of the program are being met. These
goals flow directly from the mission of the program. To accomplish this mission,
students need to demonstrate certain learning outcomes: in-depth knowledge in
the field of study; general knowledge and competencies (e.g. problem-solving skills,
communication skills); and personal/interpersonal skills (e.g. ability to work
effectively in a group). Assessment seeks to determine the extent to which students
in the program can demonstrate these learning outcomes. It is often the
case that the objectives for individual courses include or overlap with learning
outcomes for the overall program (e.g., communication skills). The distinguishing
feature of program assessment is that it addresses goals that are accomplished
across multiple courses in the curriculum. Institutional level:
At theinstitutional level, assessment seeks to
determine the degree to which broad institutional objectives are being met. For
example, how successful is Pratt in creating graduates with aesthetic judgment,
professional knowledge, collaborative skills, and technical expertise? (Mission
Statement). How well does it succeed in educating artists and creative professionals
to be responsible contributors to society? (Mission Statement). Adapted
from Bridgewater State College Assessment Guidebook; downloaded on 11/23/04 from
http://www.bridgew.edu/AssessmentGuidebook/
Types of Student Outcomes While student learning and development are
usually the primary goals faculty expect to achieve, they may have other goals
for their students and graduates. The following are types of student outcomes
that are usually examined. - Learning outcomes: What students
are expected to know, care about, and be able to do after they have completed
a program of instruction. Three types of outcomes are usually examined:
- Knowledge in the field of study
- Cognitive skills and abilities (General
Education/Liberal Arts)-- (e.g. critical thinking, esthetic judgment, technical
skills, writing skills, information literacy)
- Attitudes and values that
are consistent with the aims of the program (e.g., social responsibility, international
perspective, ability to work collaboratively)
- Other
student outcomes: They can be categorized under the loose heading of
'success'. They may include:
- Retention and timely
graduation
- Achievements of graduates (e.g. employment related to field
of study, continuation to higher levels of education)
- Accomplishments
of alumni/ae (in career, community involvement, citizenship, etc.)
| | |